Sedlacek Supercar -Watch the Movie-

grabcad

-Watch the movie- *Made one Final push and this is The final version*. In Aesthetics it displays; - MAYA; Most advanced yet acceptable form, by combining old with new design - Conjunctive ambiguity; It cannot be mistaken for anything else but a super car In Form it displays; - Contrast by;shading in its curvy shapes, - Contrast by shape in by its forward pointing duct "arrow" and backwards pointing "arrow" vent at the top - Rythm by the way the curves flow from front to back and rhythm by the arrow ducts and vents - Thus by having contrast and rhythm it displays balance in its unified whole If one is to follow the authors own visual Aesthetic theory, which is based upon Immanuel Kant's Critique of Judgment and Jürgen Schmidhuber's Theory of Beauty, the following assessments should be made; - Agreeable; Does the user group perceive the design to represent what the product actually is? Yes, because it displays conjunctive ambiguity. It is a super car, and looks like a super car. - Sublime; Does the product display any advancement visually that the user group has not perceived before? Yes, the combination of a fastback rear with a new type of front is a combination rarely seen. - Beautiful; Does the user group perceive the product to be beautiful? This needs further investigation in order to establish (interviews, voting). - Good or bad; Does the product express a good or bad persona? It displays a "bad" persona, "bad-boy". Thus fitting the persona of a super car. All of my study's show that super car's generally are perceived as "bad". - Does the product display low-Kologorov complexity? This deals with description length, thus a measurement of how hard it is for someone to perceive an object. The car displays low-Kolomogorov complexity by its form properties. Because of these factors the design ought to be aesthetically pleasing for anyone perceiving it. (If anyone is interested in seeing my report on the Aesthetic theory, contact me here.)